RIOTgamer:Gaming Reviews, News, Culture

Feminist
Pro-Queer
Anti-Racist
Gaming

 
« Fresh Prince vs. KKK: Flash GameBorder Patrol Flash Game »

"The Watchmen" Sucks: A Review & Feminist Critique


03/09/09

"The Watchmen" Sucks: A Review & Feminist Critique

Categories: Welcome, REVIEWS, movies Permalink
heather riot

The Watchmen (2009) Warner Bros: Directed by Zack Snyder.
EDIT: It should, it seems, at this point be noted that this is a review of the movie. As such, I am reviewing the movie as a standalone and not with the background knowledge provided by the book. Were I reviewing the book, the statements would likely look completely different than they do now.

I went in with excitement and an open mind. I came out three hours of my life shorter, $30 plus parking fees worth of annoyance, and a disbelieving scowl richer.
When I went to see The Dark Knight in IMAX, I was blown away. The Watchmen preview that I saw blew my mind as well and I thought, 'I absolutely have to see it at IMAX.' At least the trailer was good.

This will be the third attempt I have made at a review of The Watchmen. My thoughts on the film are such that when I sit down to write, they all rush to the forefront of my mind simultaneously, vying for the immediate attention of my hands to type them out, with speechlessness as the paradoxical result. Also difficult, is giving a standard review before a feminist critique. So, here's to trying:
Condensed review of The Watchmen
The Plot:
Maybe.

It is quite possible that I missed something here, at least, I feel as though I have. The Watchmen starts with the promise of engaging adventure, intrigue, suspense, and prolonged excitement. It then delivers only the "prolonged" - a prolonged middle, an anti-climactic climax, a few random fight scenes connected with a thin semblance of meaning or purpose. What I remember:
Fight scene
Nixon
Random dead superheros
Sex
Violence
A fire
More violence
A prison
(Chorus)
Mars
Threat of world-destroying nuclear fallout
A blue pronged cat

If this makes no sense to you, there is a club you can join.

Follow up:

This is all to say that the plot felt like the only real disaster. It may even lead you to mentally urge them to launch the nuclear weapons so that the movie would end.

Cinematography/Special Effects:
Due to the constant fluctuation of design on Rorschach's mask, it can be easy to miss everything else that transpires.

Look interesting? It is. For a few minutes.
Truly, though, the cinematography isn't so bad, it just isn't anything to write home about. Considering that this was also released in IMAX, however, makes it rather disappointing and it comes off as lackluster. A few very well-done scenes, occur sporadically throughout the film, particularly the beginning fight-sequence. Other than these moments, overall there's nothing truly spectacular about it.

Dialogue:
Rorschach narrates throughout the entire movie in excerpts from his journal. To be perfectly honest, his journal is reminiscent of the stale prose of teenage angst lying about in cluttered lockers. Thus, the narrative contains such gems as

Beneath me, this awful city, it screams like an abattoir full of retarded children. New York. Somebody knows why. Down there... somebody knows. The dusk reeks of fornication and bad consciences. I believe I shall take my exercise.

Though decidedly less angst-filled, the lines of the other cast are similarly unremarkable (or remarkable in their absurdity).

Soundtrack:
Decent but mostly unremarkable.

Feminist Critique of The Watchmen
Despite the inclusion of women superheros, including a lesbian superhero, The Watchmen somehow managed to exclude any real possibility of anything feministically sound. Near the beginning of the movie, I was at first taken with the lesbian superhero sharing an onscreen kiss with her girlfriend. Their on-screen kiss was later redeemed for heterosexists, however, when an image was presented of them both murdered, lying next to each other sideways on a bed. Their positioning on the bed and the tears in their clothing implies (intentional or not) that they may have been sexually assaulted. From this view of their corpses, the camera pans up to show "LESBIAN WHORES" scrawled on the wall in blood above the headboard. Their murder is never really addressed other than a later comment from Rorschach's narrative that they were "Killed by their own depraved lifestyle". To me, this would be an interesting area to address. While the film did show the dead bodies of other superheroes after their "fall", I have a hard time understanding how a superhero(in)es could be killed (and possibly raped) by what appear to be ordinary men.

Another moment in the film which I found to be particularly disturbing was the attempted rape of the female superhero, Silk Spectre. At one point, her and her fellow superheroes are walking through a hall on their way to a newscast(?) when she states that she is going to "freshen up". Super-creep, "The Comedian" lags behind as the rest keep walking and she meanders to another room. After noticing him staring at her disconcertingly, she tells him that she'll catch up and proceeds into the room. He follows behind after a quick check down the hall. I won't go too far into detail here, but, he tries to "put the moves on her", making such charming comments as "No as in Y-E-S?" after she refuses his advances. To this she replies, "No as in N-O". When he proceeds to go for her, she punches him in the face - a punch which sends him flying across the room. For the sake of shortening the details I don't wish to recount: he then proceeds to beat her up, and then, in a scene shot in a disturbingly sexualized manner, moves in to R her. During this time, two other male superheroes walk in and stop him.
Although she is also a superhero, capable of punching so hard that it flings The Comedian across the room, she apparently needs to be saved. This is so implausible that it's insulting. Never-mind the sexualization of rape which is, in itself, disturbing. The fact that she is shown to be helpless, that even though she is super-strong he is still able to easily "dominate" her, is ridiculous. To add further insult, the rest of the story comes through later, showing her to have fallen in love with him after this happens and to have sex with him, producing a daughter which he later appears to flirt with. This scene takes place as a flashback during The Comedian's funeral - which everyone still attends. Other flashbacks show him killing random innocent people, including a very pregnant woman in Vietnam who wishes for him to take care of his baby. Such an audacious demand, apparently, merits shooting. I understand. I understand that it paints him in a negative light. But this is never truly grappled with later. They still attend his funeral, still appear sad, still care that he is dead. He has his redeeming moment - his death and a pre-death confession in which he mentions, crying, the "things I've done to women..." Oh, well, all is well, then.

The daughter of this union becomes a superhero as well. She has a couple of good scenes in which she kicks ass. Mainly, though, her entire purpose in the film is to be the object of male affection. In this way, she helps to save the world (sort of). Her power is largely, then, derived not from her own bad-assery, but from her sexuality. Great.

Rorschach, of course, is caught up in hatred for women because of his mother.

The only people of color in the movie are criminals other than one greedy prison psychiatrist.

Overall, I found the message in the movie to be astoundingly shitty. Lesbian "whores" should be murdered for their "depraved lifestyles", women, no matter how strong, have no hope of defending themselves, a woman's true power comes from her as a sexual/emotional object, and people of color are all criminals. Thank you, Zack Snyder, for ruining my day.



12:58:15 am, by heather riot Email

Trackback address for this post

Trackback URL (right click and copy shortcut/link location)

16 comments

Rosa
Comment from: Rosa [Visitor]
I think you should read the Graphic Novel to get a better grasp of the characters. None of the "super heroes" are super, in fact they should really be called Vigilantes. Except for Dr. Manhattan. Also, no one forgives the Comedian or really mourns him, except Rorschach and his perception of women is coloured by the abusive childhood he had at the hands of his mother.
Sillouhete and her death are barely mentioned in the GN, and everyone called her death tragic, not deserved. It was meant to be a hate crime commited in the 40s and not the only one either. Hooded Justice was also considered gay and communist too, and his death remains a mystery.
As far as the rape scene it is harsh to look at and read, and the Comedian was only kicked out of the Minutemen (and not really punished). Laurie and her mom argue a lot about this, and Laurie feels very angry about her mother's rape and even confronts the Comedian about it. When Laurie realizes who her father is, she also confronts Sally about it. The rape damages both their lives even after all that time.
About the POC you are right there are too little and they are cast in a negative light, but Alan Moore is not known for being racially aware. He did write a Golliwog doll into the League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, so there you go.
03/12/09 @ 11:53
heather riot
Comment from: heather riot [Member] Email
In the film the "Who watches the Watchmen?" aspect is never adequately dealt with. The result is that, the way that the film itself was done, takes away from the un-super-ness of the superheroes. At face value, without consideration of the book, the movie itself doesn't portray it all in the same way. The Comedian is cast, in many ways, as a sort of sage-like character who, though he was terrible, was also right about the nature of the world and its inhabitants. Gone from the movie are the nuances which make the book redeemable and intelligent. Instead, they're right in the end - they know what's best for the world - and the Comedian knew all of this before anyone else.
03/12/09 @ 17:40
coffee
Comment from: coffee [Visitor] · http://www.coffeerama.com
Watchmen is a visual and psychological cornucopia -- definitely worth watching
03/14/09 @ 15:50
Gregory A.Butler
Comment from: Gregory A.Butler [Visitor] Email · http://gangbox.wordpress.com
I think you need to read the graphic novel.

And then read it again.

And then read it again.

And THEN see the movie - twice - before you try and review it.

They took 12 magazines worth of story and tried to fit it into 2 hrs and 40 minutes of run time - they had to skip over a LOT of the backstory to get all that in.

03/14/09 @ 22:12
ari riot
Comment from: ari riot [Member] Email
Having read the book...I still think the movie sucked. And frankly, I don't understand why people don't understand that a movie is a completely different entity than whatever it is based on (opera, play, book, etc). You only have like 120 pages usually to say what something else does and have to do it in a completely different way. Plus, take the HP movies. With the exception of OOTP (which still wasn't true to the novel), they are all vastly different from the book and the first three are technical, narrative, and humor nightmares. Or Lord of the Flies and the terrible, pointless 90s remake where the boys are American military school students and there is some random dying dude stilling with them the whole time.

Had I thought I could have gotten my money back...I would have.
03/14/09 @ 23:07
ari riot
Comment from: ari riot [Member] Email
And also...the film was very ambitious graphically and failed. His movies just keep getting worse. He should have stopped after 300. Just because Dr. Manhattan is walking around glowing and zapping around in all his glory and is shiny doesn't make this movie a visual masterpiece. Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow had better graphics and was a better film. And really, when Sky Captain is ranked higher- that's kinda sad.
03/14/09 @ 23:09
dude1969
Comment from: dude1969 [Visitor]
I was falling asleep, walked out 90 minutes in.
03/21/09 @ 17:41
thebatman
Comment from: thebatman [Visitor]
Aside from questioning the use of the word 'feministically', which seems like an awkward adverb, I highly enjoyed the feminist section of your review. I was almost hopeful that Zack Snyder was going to be willing to match up the total gay manitude when the lesbians showed up, only to find them killed a scant few minutes later (more casualties of yadda yadda). The characterization of the women in general seemed at best off; ladies must love their former rapists, their daughters are so indiscriminate that they will go after anything that bats his eyelashes after her, and lesbians can only show up to show diversity so long as they are killed off later.

Now, here's the real question: blue penis? Lots of blue, floppy, non-erect penis? I have trouble seeing this movie as anything but another in what I hope (but do not expect) will be a short line of misogynistic high-budget softcore porn for gay men. Why is it okay nowadays to objectify men but not women? I mean it's film: film's job is to make the things on it into objects. Why can't we just accept this and realize that EVERYBODY in a movie will necessarily be objectified?

To be perfectly frank, I have decided that I will never see another Zack Snyder film unless there is some objectifiation parity here: at least one of the nude ladies should have bigger breasts than any of the nude men, and there should be at least as much naked boob on display on the ladies as on the men. If that means Snyder can't release any more films on the wide scree, then awesome. I wish the same thing would happen to Spielburg.

But yes, I appreciate the review, enjoyed it, but I want to hear SOMETHING done about floppy blue penis. It sucks, in its current form. Either make it erect, or put it away.
03/22/09 @ 06:56
Nick of the Mountains
Comment from: Nick of the Mountains [Visitor]
I understand how you feel about The Watchmen. It is not Dark Knight, but I feel Watchmen is very good in it's own right, and I feel like it is getting a bit of a bad rap. I agree that The Comedian, though a legendary character in the series, is a man deeply inmoral and cynical, which the rape scene I thought was nuts, because fiction or non-fiction it is screwed up, and not to glorify what he did because I do not go for rape, especially towards women and children, but how many characters like him do you meet, who are good yet complexed dark-wise. Till then, you have a good day. Rock On RiotGamer!
-Nick of the Mountains.
03/22/09 @ 20:06
heather riot
Comment from: heather riot [Member] Email
Dude1969:

I envy you for that. I thought about walking out every 5 minutes - the only reason I didn't was that I thought, perhaps, some of the plot points would be, I don't know, resolved or explored. A more coherent plot could be fashioned on an Etch-a-Sketch.
03/22/09 @ 20:11
heather riot
Comment from: heather riot [Member] Email
thebatman:
I guess that I just resolved the hanging man-parts with the thought that he had to be naked so that, every five minutes or so, when he nuked someone else, his clothes weren't incinerated in the process.

Aside from that, I thought the film was, overall, the anti-gay. The lesbians were killed and the quasi-villain-hero was an implied gay-man.

I definitely think that Snyder would make a better porn director. A soft-core porn on Showtime at 2am has a more intriguing and captivating plot than this film turned out.
03/22/09 @ 20:18
heather riot
Comment from: heather riot [Member] Email
Oh. And as far as reading the book goes, see edit.

If they were handing out the graphic novel before people walked in the door to see the film, I missed it. As I don't believe they did, I can only assume that the film was intended to be able to stand on its own while pleasing fans of the graphic novel as well. That is, I don't believe there was a prerequisite reading for the film - if there was I would have reviewed it in those terms.
03/22/09 @ 20:21
deathbaker
Comment from: deathbaker [Visitor]
Thanks for writing this review.

I think with book-to-movie adaptations, fans are always going to be a little bit disappointed with what is and what is not included in the movie... But I think by now it is understood that with such little time, a lot of stuff will be left out...
So my question is, why include the attempted rape scene at all? 2 hrs and 37 minutes instead of 2 hrs and 40 minutes sounds good to me.
For not having enough time to do the story proper justice, they certainly put a lot of effort into making it such a drawn out and graphically disturbing scene.
03/28/09 @ 04:43
heather riot
Comment from: heather riot [Member] Email
Nick:
As far as the Watchmen, there are parts I can appreciate, but I feel that, as a movie alone, it isn't anywhere near what it could have been. There are, of course, differences of opinion between me and others (even in the feministing community) regarding its content. Mostly I believe that, while Snyder remained true to bits of dialogue and content, the way that the movie displayed it, the things that it omitted or raced through, resulted in a movie which may have missed the overall bigger picture. And, while I didn't mention it in the review, I did actually find the opening fight scene with the Comedian to be fairly visually astounding. Then again, I'm also told that this very closely matches a scene in another movie so...who knows. Also not mentioned in the review is that I find Snyder's movies to be increasingly disappointing - I loved his remake of Dawn of the Dead, but I think Romero was also involved in the film.
04/02/09 @ 13:15
heather riot
Comment from: heather riot [Member] Email
deathbaker:
I absolutely agree. This was one of the main problems that I had with the movie - the things which they chose to keep vs. what they left out. The way it was done had a completely different 'take home message' than the book necessarily had. Some people have argued that the scene shows the true brutality and violence in that act, but the camera's angle puts us in the Comedian's actions, the Comedian's point of view.

Glad you like it - thanks for your input!
04/02/09 @ 13:18
Jennybump
Comment from: Jennybump [Visitor]
Weird review heather riot. The movie sucked. I think the soundtrack was the worst part. I wouldn't bother 'critiquing' any other aspect of the movie. It just doesn't take well to inspection by normal or radical political and social categories. A more thoughtful and longer treatment would be required if you really wanted to do that. I'm saying your critique seems a bit juvenile. I'm sticking with "the soundtrack was the worst part" and leaving it at that.

-bump
07/26/09 @ 21:23

This post has 2 feedbacks awaiting moderation...

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
What color is grass?
antispam test





Add to Google

RECENT POSTS:

Search

powered by b2evolution free blog software